The end of the world, according to the
Mayan Calendar, has been widely reported by the major media as
predicting the “end of the world” on 12/21/2012. I am still here,
enjoying a generic shot of whiskey (yes, I know: cheapskate, on your
last day could you at least pop for a bottle Jack Daniels?). Not
surprisingly, these propeller-heads got it wrong.
Or did they?
THE TEA PARTY WINS!!!
Surely the end of the world? The tail
wagging the dog? For weeks, the Speaker signaled that he would
surrender to the Prez, increasing taxes on “the rich”, acceding
to the call for class warfare: rich are evil, poor are being cheated.
He put all his chips on the table, and put forth his official
surrender document for the vote. It lost big time in the House, and
you can pin the defeat/victory on the Tea Party. Congress is going
home for Christmas with their families, and the proposed surrender of
the Republican Party by the Speaker has not occurred.
Either: Hallelujah!!!, or This Is Truly
The End.
ABOUT THE MAYAN CALENDAR
Oddly, many moons ago (forgive the
rather authentic use of the Coastanoan language), I took a brief
archealogical course on Mayan numbering, calendar, and glyphs. You
may have heard that they did not have the concept of the number
“zero”, and was therefore inferior to the Arabic numbering
system.
Poppycock.
The Mayan calendar is based on cycles,
ranging from one day to 60 million years. When you reach the end of
one cycle, you crank up the next higher level cycle up one and
restart the current cycle at “one”.
12/21/2012 marks the end of the current
“Baktun” cycle, which occurs every 394 years. This will advance
the next “Piktun” cycle, which is 7,885 years per, by one cycle.
[accordingly, if we count from the very beginning of the Mayan
culture to today, we have not yet traversed one Piktun cycle; yes,
there are 4 cycles above the Piktun].
FYI, the lower cycle is “katun”,
which is every 19 years. So, by the logic of the NY Times, the world
should end every 19 years.
What stupidity.
[note: I no longer have the textbook
from a coupl'a decades ago, so the actual numbers above, of which I
am not 100% sure, I borrowed from Wikipedia].
No comments:
Post a Comment